[postgis-devel] autobuild cleanup - version revisited

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

Obe, Regina wrote:
> That looks really cool, leaves no room for confusion, and makes us look 
> really important.
> 
> Although would
> that cause problems with our build since we use that in the docs to infer
> the tars and stuff (or we would continue using the rest of the version 
> for that).
> 
> Actually that's more along the lines of how SQL Server does it.
> I'm running
> 
> SQL Server 9.00.3042.00 (X64) 
> 
> In case anyone cares.
> 
> I suspect that .3042 maps to some repository version number.  I think those
> extra 00s at the end denote whether you are running enterprise, standard 
> or something.
> 
> Wonder how oracle does it.

I think the 1.3.4SVN/1.4.0SVN tags should be enough - at the end of the 
day if someone is running a development version then they must at least 
be competent enough to download and build from source. And the first 
thing I will say to anyone who files a bug report with an SVN version 
tag regardless is download the latest SVN and try again... ;)


ATB,

Mark.

-- 
Mark Cave-Ayland
Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
T: +44 870 608 0063