[postgis-devel] Any chance we can get a 1.3.6 RC1 out this week

[Paul Ramsey]

(And I really tried to do this more mechanically, following the 'how
to release', which will be my goal going forward, so mistakes in this
tarball can be used to fix the automated parts of how to release, and
hopefully automate it more.)

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at opengeo.org> wrote:
> I've wrapped an 'rc1' and placed it here:
>
> http://postgis.refractions.net/download/postgis-1.3.6rc1.tar.gz
>
> Please test it a bit and then we'll announce to the wider audience.
>
> P
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>> I've been testing under Windows 2003 and seems okay - comparing some stress
>> tests between 1.3.5 and 1.3.6 (though was using GEOS 3.1.0 -- still need to
>> test with 3.0.3.
>>
>> My tests on 8.4 beta 1 under windows I think I'm seeing some discrepancies
>> between ST_Within behavior, but could be my diffing is out of wack  and
>> haven't determined if its an issue with 1.3.6 or 1.4.0.  I had installed
>> both under the same 8.4 beta 1 install in separate more or less identical
>> databases.  Still yet to test on Linux.
>>
>> It would really help if we have an up to date tar ball for both at the very
>> least.
>>
>> The Union behavior between the 1.3.6 and 1.4.0 is very different, but I
>> think that is expected and under an OpenJump microscope the results at least
>> have the same number of points and look visually the same.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>
>