[postgis-devel] Can we do a final 1.3.6RC2 and go live
Kevin Neufeld
kneufeld at refractions.net
Wed Apr 29 22:15:15 PDT 2009
If it's fixed in trunk and it's not really an issue for 1.3, then my
vote is to leave it for any small patch release we may do for 1.3.7.
-- Kevin
Paragon Corporation wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> I guess the only thing that did fail that I thought we had fixed and then
> realized we only did it for 1.4 is this one
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/104
>
> But it works, just gives warnings and larger shape files I loaded and dumped
> seem to work fine too. I guess since the problem has always been there its
> probably not worth fixing for 1.3 series and risk breaking it in unless if
> someone feels its worthwhile.
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Neufeld
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 12:18 AM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Can we do a final 1.3.6RC2 and go live
>
> Yes, I'm testing the branch and trunk against 8.2.13, 8.3.7, and 8.4beta.
> http://office.refractions.net:1500/view/PostGIS%20Branch/
>
> 1.3.6 passes without a hitch on 8.4.
> http://office.refractions.net:1500/view/PostGIS%20Branch/job/PostGIS-branch-
> regress84/ws/regress_results/results.log/*view*/
>
> -- Kevin
>
> Paragon Corporation wrote:
>
>> I finally got around to testing 1.3.6RC1 and 1.3.6SVN on my OpenSUSE
>> 11 running PostgreSQL 8.4beta1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC
>> gcc (GCC) 3.4.6
>> 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-10), 32-bit
>> Postgis 1.3.6SVN - 2009-04-30 03:38:51
>> GEOS: 3.1.0-CAPI-1.5.0
>> PROJ: Rel. 4.6.0, 21 Dec 2007
>>
>> I'm content everything works as expected.
>> Make check passes except for kml which didn't pass in 1.3.5 anyway.
>>
>> Kevin -- did you ever test 1.3.6 on 8.4 beta or you just tested the
>> 1.4 branch?
>> I would have assumed I would get similar false positive errors you
>> got in
>> 1.4 make check in my 1.3.6 tests, but I didn't. I have yet to do a
>> make check on 1.4 against 8.4.
>>
>> Anyrate -- can we have 1 more RC just so people can test those last
>> minute changes we put in and go live next week if no one complains?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list