[postgis-devel] WKTRaster: RASTER and CHIP

Obe, Regina robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov
Fri Jan 16 09:22:01 PST 2009


Playing devlis advocate to Kevin's devils advocate.

I personally think its fine and am with Paul on this.

1) WKT Raster has to live somewhere and it should live in the same
repository with PostGIS because that is the most likely place people
will expect to find it.

2) It is going to have to be back-patched at some point whether it lives
in its own branch in PostGIS repository or someplace else in the world.
So I consider the whole discussion about the difficulty of back-patching
moot.

Thanks,
Regina 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of
Kevin Neufeld
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 12:16 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] WKTRaster: RASTER and CHIP

Playing the devil's advocate here, but ...

Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Branches are cheap. 

Seriously?  I always thought back-patching and maintaining a current
branch (autobuilds, website, documentation, etc) 
take up considerable resources.

-- Kevin
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
-----------------------------------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.



More information about the postgis-devel mailing list