[postgis-devel] Aggregates

[Obe, Regina]

Personally if you got rid of those GArrays I'd be fine since it looks like you are introducing new versions with same functionality.

While you are building your big spreadsheet of doom.  Don't forget to add those 20 someodd functions we really want to get rid of.


-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Thu 1/22/2009 6:02 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: [postgis-devel] Aggregates
 
I've flipped all the aggregate functions that used to build arrays the
old way to use the new code (at r3565).

ST_MakeLine( geometry )
ST_Polygonize( geometry )
ST_Collect( geometry )
ST_Union( geometry )
ST_Accum( geometry )

These are all on the new code now. For comparison, I've left behind
two legacy implementations, that will disappear before release:

ST_Accum_old( geometry )
ST_Union_old( geometry )

I also thought that

ST_MakeLine( geometry[] )
ST_Polygonize( goemetry[] )
ST_Collect( geometry[] )
ST_Union( geometry[] )

were all more "in the spirit of PostgreSQL" so I have added them.

I will agitate for the removal of

ST_Makeline_Garray( geometry[] )
et al

later, as I build my big spreadsheet-of-doom.

Paul
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel



-----------------------------------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20090122/c0c9d6b0/attachment.html>