[postgis-devel] [PostGIS] #180: History table example implementation

PostGIS trac at osgeo.org
Thu Jul 2 11:31:19 PDT 2009


#180: History table example implementation
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  pramsey      |       Owner:  pimpaa       
      Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  assigned     
  Priority:  medium       |   Milestone:  postgis 1.5.0
 Component:  postgis      |     Version:               
Resolution:               |    Keywords:               
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by pramsey):

 Current version attribute is not so useful for people, but can be quite
 useful for software. Keep it around.

 Updating geometry_columns yourself is acceptable.

 I don't think a separate schema is wise, because for databases that
 already have schema partitioning, you'll end up putting all the history
 tables from different schemas into one place, potentially raising name
 collisions, etc. I think a simple table naming scheme, either your 'h_'
 one or a '_history' one (btw, I think 'history_' is better than 'h_', we
 can spare the extra characters) is preferable.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/180#comment:6>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
PostGIS


More information about the postgis-devel mailing list