[postgis-devel] Re: [PostGIS] #160: prefix not recognized in 1.4.0SVN
Kevin Neufeld
kneufeld at refractions.net
Tue Jun 2 09:28:05 PDT 2009
An (albeit small) issue I see with this is:
The autobuild environment I set up is organized in such a way that I can have various versions of the PostGIS
dependences pre-built (GEOS, Proj, Postgresql, etc.). That way I can build PostGIS against various configurations for
testing.
Being tied to PGXS means that the same can never be said about liblwgeom - it'll be tied directly to a particular
PostgreSQL installation. If someone wanted to build a project that relies on liblwgeom, building various versions will be:
- configure
- make
- find liblwgeom.so and related links
- manually copy libs to particular installation directory
instead of the typical make && make install.
Not a big deal by any means, but I guess that's another reason why it might be a good idea to have liblwgeom as a
separate project.
-- Kevin
PostGIS wrote:
> #160: prefix not recognized in 1.4.0SVN
> -----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
> Reporter: kneufeld | Owner: mcayland
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: low | Milestone: postgis 1.4.0
> Component: postgis | Version:
> Resolution: | Keywords:
> -----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
> Comment (by mcayland):
>
> I'm not convinced that this is necessarily a bug; the new version of
> configure has NO knowledge of any of the installation paths since this is
> handled entirely by PGXS, and for a good reason. The location of the sql
> files in particular has tended to change from version to version.
>
> There may be an argument for extending PGXS so that --prefix specifies a
> new root directory rather than an a prefix (which is perhaps what Kevin
> was expecting to see?). But if you're interested in this as a feature,
> you'd need to chase it up with the PGSQL folks.
>
>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.
>
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list