[postgis-devel] [WKT Raster] Still using old SVN

[Mark Leslie]

I agree, I don't think the old repo should live long enough to cause 
consistency issues between the two.  The sooner all committers have 
moved to osgeo the less likely things are to get confused between the two.

Paragon Corporation wrote:
> Mateusz,
> I don't see any reason not to, but maybe others cant.  Eventually WKT Raster
> will be part of PostGIS (to me the only reason it isn't is because it is not
> completely stable yet so in philosophy I consider it already a part.  We
> will have the same issues with other stuff like curved support, 3D that we
> will be spiking in sandboxes and so forth that are already baked in) and
> besides wasn't the point of moving the svn so we can shut down the other one
> since its sort of unstable?
> 
> Thanks,
> Regina
>  
> +1
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Mateusz
> Loskot
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 9:39 AM
> To: postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> Subject: [postgis-devel] [WKT Raster] Still using old SVN
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I still commit WKT Raster to spike on old SVN server.
> Should I switch to new server on svn.osgeo.org?
> 
> PostGIS has just entered OSGeo incubation process and I'm not sure if it's
> fine to "mess" PostGIS source tree with stuff that does not strictly belong
> to the project.
> 
> Should we follow PostGIS and switch to svn.osgeo.org?
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo,
> http://osgeo.org _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel