[postgis-devel] postgis-1.5.sql

[Chris Hodgson]

Paul, you bring this question up so often it makes me wonder if there 
really is a reason...

http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-devel/2009-August/006599.html

It all pints back to:

http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/94

Where it seems the argument against numbering the .sql was that you'd 
have to also number the .so, which you didn't want to do because it 
complicated the update process.

Chris

Paul Ramsey wrote:
> What do we think about numbering the SQL file? I think it seems wise, is there a reason to not do it?
>
> P
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>