[postgis-devel] GML3 output signatures

[Olivier Courtin]

On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Olivier Courtin wrote:
>
>> Hum after have a look on the code, i understand the aim.
>> And yes it's fine to me to have only a single bitfield on the  
>> prototype.
>
> Patch is ready.
> https://github.com/strk/postgis/commit/64a1fe427b902f304814cf757f0cc83282180931
>
> Passes cunit and sql regression tests.

Looks good to me (even if not tested)

> I'm wondering if I should change the name of the LW_GML_IS_DIMS flag:
>
> https://github.com/strk/postgis/commit/64a1fe427b902f304814cf757f0cc83282180931 
> #L1R1791

Could be for the SRS part (to be more precise)
but don't get the SKIP part (or you have to revert al the tests)

--
Olivier