[postgis-devel] [PostGIS] #871: [raster] ST_AddBand documentation is inconsistent with function definitions and spec
PostGIS
trac at osgeo.org
Wed Mar 23 10:13:51 PDT 2011
#871: [raster] ST_AddBand documentation is inconsistent with function definitions
and spec
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: pracine
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: medium | Milestone: PostGIS 2.0.0
Component: postgis raster | Version: trunk
Keywords: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by pracine):
So what do you prefer?:
st_addband(torast raster, fromrast raster, fromband integer, toband
integer);
or
st_addband(torast raster, toband integer, fromrast raster, fromband
integer);
I first planned the first version because toband is really an optional
argument, but as robe mentionned it does not follow the convention that
band number should follow the raster. I was happy with this exception
since toband do not refer to an existing band and that it is really
optionnal.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/871#comment:2>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list