[postgis-devel] PostgresQL 9.1 beta released

[Paragon Corporation]

I can help with the testing, but not sure I'd be much use to you doing
anything else.

Thanks,
Regina 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 12:58 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] PostgresQL 9.1 beta released

I would be ecstatic to have a hand...

The transition is basically complete, the only thing staying me from
switching over is knowing that after the switch there will be bugs
unforeseen that have to be fixed. Now, I've been away from the code base for
6 weeks (since Montreal) so things might have changed, but at that point the
situation was that the next step was:

- turn GSERIALIZED_ON in gserialized.h
- check again that all the regression failures are actually ones we're
willing to accept (they are mostly about slight changes in the output of
M-valued geometries in nested WKT, and I've decided they are "good"
regressions)
- commit to using GSERIALIZED, and commit the regression changes

The big pieces of work remaining at that point would be:

- add selectivity to the 3d/4d index (&&&) bindings
- add typmod support to geometry, following the example in geography

And cleanup work would be

- actually remove the dead pieces of code that GSERIALIZED_ON turns off
- actually search/replace the types that GSERIALIZED_ON currently just
re#defines
- remove the old WKT parser and WKB parser (these are currently unused
except in some cunit tests that compare the new/old code for
consistency)
- continue to review the LWGEOM API and look for functions that can/should
be moved to the internal.h header and out of the public API

P.




On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayland at siriusit.co.uk> wrote:
> On 03/05/11 02:41, Paragon Corporation wrote:
>
>> Just a heads up - 9.1 is nearing closer to the finish line.  Looks 
>> like they are expecting to release within the next 2-3 months.
>>
>> Would be nice if we could beat them to the finish line or at least be 
>> done around the same time for better chance of 9.1 people starting 
>> their experience with PostGIS 2.0 instead of 1.5.
>>
>> http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2011/05/02/9-1-beta-1-is-out-help-us-tes
>> t/
>
> I think this is highly unlikely as the switch to G_GEOMETRY is still 
> not complete :(
>
> Paul - is there a general status/TODO so other people can get a feel 
> for what remains to be done and chip in as necessary? Currently there 
> are quite a few outstanding bugs related to this in Trac, and I don't 
> think anyone else knows enough about where we are with all this to lend a
hand.
>
>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.
>
> --
> Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect PostgreSQL - PostGIS 
> Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom 
> http://www.siriusit.co.uk
> t: +44 870 608 0063
>
> Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel