[postgis-devel] Speaking of openness and formality - finish vote on Bborie Park as a committer
Sandro Santilli
strk at keybit.net
Fri May 13 01:26:39 PDT 2011
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:54:54AM -0700, Chris Hodgson wrote:
> I think the idea is, not everyone in the PSC needs to know enough about
> everything to have a meaningful vote on everything. +2 means at least a
> motion and a 'second', both from people who are willing to support the
> proposition in a meaningful way, if it is necessary. It prevents a
> single person from just doing whatever they want, in theory, without
> forcing every decision to wait for every voter (or even half of the
> voters) to reply.
It makes sense. Especially since a single -1 is enough to veto.
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list