[postgis-devel] Speaking of openness and formality - finish vote on Bborie Park as a committer

Sandro Santilli strk at keybit.net
Fri May 13 01:26:39 PDT 2011

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:54:54AM -0700, Chris Hodgson wrote:

> I think the idea is, not everyone in the PSC needs to know enough about 
> everything to have a meaningful vote on everything. +2 means at least a 
> motion and a 'second', both from people who are willing to support the 
> proposition in a meaningful way, if it is necessary. It prevents a 
> single person from just doing whatever they want, in theory, without 
> forcing every decision to wait for every voter (or even half of the 
> voters) to reply.

It makes sense. Especially since a single -1 is enough to veto.


  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html

More information about the postgis-devel mailing list