[postgis-devel] Speaking of openness and formality - finish vote on Bborie Park as a committer
Pierre.Racine at sbf.ulaval.ca
Fri May 13 10:51:20 PDT 2011
> In the docs, we did say Paul is the current SVN administrator, so I guess
> formality wise he should do it, unless we want to change that.
Paul answered last week so I guess Bborie now have commit access. Did you give it a try Bborie?
> So one last formality remains before we can give Bborie commit rights -
> which actually all current committers have to retroactively agree to.
> Can all folks listed on the bottom of this:
> Including Bborie -- confirm they agree with these guidelines?
I read the guidelines and agree with them. This document is very well written and I'm glad such a document exist (even if it does since only 3 weeks!).
I have some questions/comments though:
-It would be nice to have the "SVN Commit Practice numbered" (so we can refer to them) and listed in order of importance (and/or maybe grouped into sections like "To do when Commiting", "Branches", "Restriction on Commits", "Broken Build").
-Only PSC people, on the agreement of other PSC people, should be allowed to modify this document.
-The sentence "Once a new feature ticket is completed, it should have in keywords section of ticket with history. " is not clear for me. What does that mean?
-There has been a large number of tickets fixed for PostGIS raster. Should we add them all in the NEWS document? In any other document? Can we just write a little text describing PostGIS raster and list the contributors?
More information about the postgis-devel