[postgis-devel] [raster] hasnodata, exclude_nodata, include_nodata , whatever nodata :)
Paragon Corporation
lr at pcorp.us
Fri May 27 15:33:34 PDT 2011
I took this off the ticket since it's a side topic affecting many functions.
I feel we can use different names as long as we don't use the same name to
mean two different things.
But if we must go with one name, the value must mean the same thing as
hasnodata so that people used to using that argument don't get surprised
when it does something different.
How about:
exclude_nodata_value = true is the same as hasnodata=true
I don't really think we need to throw band in there since the nodata is tied
to a band.
Thanks,
Regina
-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of PostGIS
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 5:24 PM
Cc: postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] [PostGIS] #985: [raster] ST_Count
#985: [raster] ST_Count
-----------------------------+------------------------------------------
-----------------------------+----
Reporter: dustymugs | Owner: dustymugs
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: medium | Milestone: PostGIS 2.0.0
Component: postgis raster | Version: trunk
Resolution: | Keywords: history
-----------------------------+------------------------------------------
-----------------------------+----
Comment(by pracine):
I think we should keep it then...
I think this name should be consistent and involve the same behavior for
all functions (ST_Value and ST_Intersects included).
What about "disablebandnodata"? Which means the opposite of hasnodata...
and should be FALSE by default.
I think Regina should come with a consistent name that we can apply
everywhere. I was happy with hasnodata. Snif ;-( I already miss it...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/985#comment:15>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/> The PostGIS Trac is used for bug,
enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the
subversion code repository of PostGIS project.
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list