[postgis-devel] [PostGIS] #1287: Drop of "gist_geometry_ops" broke a few clients
PostGIS
trac at osgeo.org
Sun Nov 13 07:48:27 PST 2011
#1287: Drop of "gist_geometry_ops" broke a few clients
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: pramsey
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone: PostGIS 2.0.0
Component: postgis | Version: trunk
Keywords: |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Comment(by robe):
strk -- I'm all for not encouraging it. In the docs I changed , I didn't
see any mention of ops or ops_2d. I added the use of ops_nd. That said
haven't finished going thru the docs.
I'm not so much concerned about those who have compensated, as having to
rip out a lot of code (all the ops have to change, my upgrade process is
screwed up etc. - so I guess when I say those I mean ME). That said I
think more people are annoyed about indecisiveness than any particular
decision we make, as they've already started their development to be ready
when we are.
We all prefer the new naming since its clearer, it will make obvious all
those software trying to create tables with the old antiquated name which
we'll desperately want to get rid of in the future, we've already sewn the
seed, let's not pull out the plant so late in the game (I've done a lot of
restores of databases on 2.0 I've had for ages and haven't run into an
issue with this). Speaking of indecisiveness, can we please decide on
what we will have for unknown, that is irritating people too -- not what
we will decide, but when. I'll put a vote on that on the table. At this
point I don't care so much just that we come to a conclusion.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/1287#comment:6>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list