[postgis-devel] loader why do I have two sets of executables

[Paragon Corporation]

Hmm very interesting looks like a mishmush of binary and shell script
inside.

Never seen anything like it before.  BTW that NLS line prevents me from
compiling this at all fails with can't find locale something or other so now
I absolutely have to comment that line nls line out.  On the bright side I
guess that's better since it warns I will have a screwed up binary before it
makes it.

Are we using NLS for anything?  I thought we decided we aren't going to do
any localization at least for now?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net 
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On 
> Behalf Of Sandro Santilli
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:22 AM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] loader why do I have two sets of 
> executables
> 
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Paragon Corporation 
> <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> 
> > It seems I have 2 sets of executables.
> >
> > One set is in /loader which are all much smaller and are 
> > dysfunctional, though looking at the dependency walker I 
> don't see why they should be.
> >
> > The other set in a new folder called /loader/.libs which seem to be 
> > the set I'm used to having and are functional?
> 
> The smaller ones are shell scripts setting up the environment 
> so to use the built (pre-installed) libraries.
> They'll invoke the real binaries found in .libs, which are 
> the ones that get installed by make install.
> That's the way libtool works.
> 
> --strk;
> 
> Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
> http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>