[postgis-devel] proliferation of trac components

Sandro Santilli strk at keybit.net
Wed Feb 29 10:35:10 PST 2012

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:52:49AM -0500, Pierre Racine wrote:
>  > Is it worth having a "gdal" component ?
> > And a "third party" one ?
> > What are they for, exactly ?
> > 
> > This is the postgis trac, bugs in other packages should be somewhere else, no ?
> Yes but maybe we want to "trac" some in our database. No? Probably you haven't got the need to do it for geos because you have much control over it, but it is not the case for GDAL and QGIS.
> I would be happy with the more general 'dependencies' instead of 'gdal'...

Note that both GDAL and QGIS use the same authentication that PostGIS
uses (the OSGEO LDAP) so you should be able to file tickets there w/out
much hassle. GDAL is also based on the same version of trac, while QGIS
is a bit more fancy (redmine).


  |   __/  |    Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
  |  / 2.0 |    http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com

More information about the postgis-devel mailing list