[postgis-devel] Documentation and comments in tarball
Sandro Santilli
strk at keybit.net
Mon Jan 9 23:53:47 PST 2012
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:55:58PM -0500, Paragon Corporation wrote:
>
>
> > Is there a general consensus about what should be shipped and what not
> > in the tarball ? My personal opinion is that only sources should be in
> > a source tarball, and documentation is no exception, but if the majority
> > decides for a different setup please let me know and I'll update the
> > make_dist.sh script accordingly.
>
> > As a packager, I would like to see things included if not including them
> would greatly expand the required build dependencies, where 'greatly' in
> practice is about not dragging in huge xml toolchains that otherwise would
> not be needed. And otherwise, I have a bias against including generatable
> files.
The thing is: if you just want to _read_ the documentation, get a binary
package for them. If you want to contribute then you'll need the additional
dependencies anyway.
Comments add 480 Kb, requires: xsltproc
single-page html adds 2 Mb + 1.24 Mb for images, requires: xsltproc, imagemagick
pdf adds 7.83 Mb, requires: dblatex, imagemagick
Both HTML and PDF documentation could be made available online.
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list