[postgis-devel] topology expectations?

[Jose Carlos Martinez]

Sandro, thanks to tell me. I will share my worries and wishes when I 
have a while. Problem is my mother tongue is Spanish and its really 
difficult for me to try to explain all the work and ideas I can have 
about it in English. I think that is the reason sometimes I m not able 
to explain myself about tolerance problems.
Anyways congratulations because I think you are doing a great job with 
persistent topology. It was a lack of functionality in all the open 
source software.
Cheers,


On 21/03/2012 17:06, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 04:58:38PM +0100, Jose Carlos Martinez wrote:
>
>> For me and for any person who is working with cartography the
>> tolerance is crucial. I tried many months ago in the PostGIS and JTS
>> lists to discuss and to explain how important is a tolerance system
>> but unfortunately I didnt conviced many people.
> Hey, you have people willing to listen now :)
>
> Would you want to dump some ideas on the recently added page ?
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/ToleranceDiscussion
>
>> Im happy though that with persistent topology maybe its going to be
>> the first time I can use PostGIS with a complex cartographic model
>> without breaking the spatial relation ships among closed geometries
>> every time I want to modify one geometry as in a simple feature
>> model happens. (-:
> Looking forward to you feedback!
>
> --strk;
>
>    ,------o-.
>    |   __/  |    Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
>    |  / 2.0 |    http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
>    `-o------'
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel