[postgis-devel] Ack! postgis.control is not getting install!
Stephen Woodbridge
woodbri at swoodbridge.com
Sat Jun 8 13:25:22 PDT 2013
I know the May 23rd tarball worked ok, but I over wrote it with the
newest download so I don't have that one.
I can grab beta2 and try that.
-Steve
On 6/8/2013 3:34 PM, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Does the
>
> Wget http://download.osgeo.org/postgis/source/postgis-2.1.0beta2.tar.gz
>
> Work okay. I still haven't had a chance to test locally. I verified that
> the control files are being included in the tar ball but acutally building
> form svn isn't working either.
>
> I checked winnie's installs and noticed the installed version from pg9.3w64
> in her folder is dated 6/4/2013 and so are all the sql files which matches
> with what you are saying.
>
> I've ticketed this issue
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2356
>
> And will try to trace what change broke this.
>
> Thanks for catching it though. We currently have no mechanism in our
> regression testing to test extensions (so I just do before I package or on
> various spot checks) so its REALLY great that you guys do.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
> http://www.postgis.us
> http://postgis.net
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> Woodbridge
> Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 11:14 AM
> To: postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Ack! postgis.control is not getting install!
>
> OK, Below is what I did and what's in the extensions and contrib
> directories. I can not install 2.1 at all as an extenstion because the
> control file and all the sql files are missing.
>
> -Steve
>
> # old beta3 may 23rd that worked installed cd postgis-2.1.0beta3dev sudo
> make uninstall cd ..
> rm -rf postgis-2.1.0beta3dev
> wget http://postgis.net/stuff/postgis-2.1.0beta3dev.tar.gz
> tar xzf postgis-2.1.0beta3dev.tar.gz
> cd postgis-2.1.0beta3dev
> ./configure --with-pgconfig=/usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/pg_config
> make
> sudo make install
>
> And this is what I now have in my /usr/share/postgresql/9.2/extension/
> related to postgis.
>
> postgis--2.0.0--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0alpha1--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0alpha2--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0alpha3--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0alpha4--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0alpha5--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0alpha6--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0beta1--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0beta2--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0beta3--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0beta4--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0rc1--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.0rc2--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.1--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.2--2.0.3.sql
> postgis--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.0.0--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.0.1--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.0.2--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.0.3--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0beta1--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0beta3dev--2.1.0beta3devnext.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0beta3devnext--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0SVN--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_tiger_geocoder.control
> postgis_tiger_geocoder--unpackaged--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha1--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha2--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha3--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha4--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha5--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha6--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0beta1--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0beta2--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0beta3--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0beta4--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0rc1--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.0rc2--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.1--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.1--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.2--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.2--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.3--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--2.1.0beta1--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology--2.1.0beta3dev--2.1.0beta3devnext.sql
> postgis_topology--2.1.0beta3devnext--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology--2.1.0SVN--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis_topology.control
> postgis_topology--unpackaged--2.0.3.sql
> postgis_topology--unpackaged--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
> postgis--unpackaged--2.0.3.sql
>
>
> And in the contrib I have:
>
> ls /usr/share/postgresql/9.2/contrib/postgis*
> /usr/share/postgresql/9.2/contrib/postgis-2.0:
> legacy_gist.sql rtpostgis_upgrade_20_minor.sql
> legacy_minimal.sql spatial_ref_sys.sql
> legacy.sql topology_comments.sql
> postgis_comments.sql topology.sql
> postgis_restore.pl topology_upgrade_20_minor.sql
> postgis.sql uninstall_legacy.sql
> postgis_upgrade_20_minor.sql uninstall_postgis.sql
> raster_comments.sql uninstall_rtpostgis.sql
> rtpostgis_legacy.sql uninstall_topology.sql
> rtpostgis.sql
>
> /usr/share/postgresql/9.2/contrib/postgis-2.1:
> legacy_gist.sql rtpostgis_upgrade_20_21.sql
> legacy_minimal.sql rtpostgis_upgrade_21_minor.sql
> legacy.sql spatial_ref_sys.sql
> postgis_comments.sql topology_comments.sql
> postgis_restore.pl topology.sql
> postgis.sql topology_upgrade_21_minor.sql
> postgis_upgrade_20_21.sql uninstall_legacy.sql
> postgis_upgrade_21_minor.sql uninstall_postgis.sql
> raster_comments.sql uninstall_rtpostgis.sql
> rtpostgis_legacy.sql uninstall_sfcgal.sql
> rtpostgis.sql uninstall_topology.sql
>
>
>
>
> On 6/8/2013 10:50 AM, Paragon Corporation wrote:
>> Guys,
>> Sorry about this I'll check on this issue why no control file. No
>> postgis-2.1.0beta3dev is not stable. That is why I put a dev at the
>> end of it.
>> The one you want to use for stability has no dev ---
>> postgis-2.1.0beta2
>> http://www.postgis.net/2013/05/11/postgis-2-1-0beta2
>> Sorry for the confusion. I changed from our standard development
>> extension (SVN to dev) in case one day we won't be using SVN.
>> As a general rule, we always put our tagged builds on our osgeo
>> download site.
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> *From:* postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Daniel
>> Kastl
>> *Sent:* Saturday, June 08, 2013 10:16 AM
>> *To:* PostGIS Development Discussion
>> *Subject:* Re: [postgis-devel] Ack! postgis.control is not getting
> install!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
>> <woodbri at swoodbridge.com <mailto:woodbri at swoodbridge.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dev,
>>
>> The current postgis-2.1.0beta3dev.tar.gz and svn are not installing
>> the postgis.control file. The other two control files are there.
>>
>> Poor Daniel has been setting a travis instance for pgrouting and
>> puzzling over this issue because we require pulling 2.1 and doing a
>> local build and install from that for pgrouting. So I guess we
>> running a postgis build-bot also :)
>>
>>
>> Well, Steve told me that the postgis-2.1.0beta3dev.tar.gz is changing
>> every night, which explains that it worked still 4 days ago. I thought
>> it would be a "stable" beta.
>> As a Travis newbie I thought I messed up something with the install
>> script ;-)
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
>> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
>> <mailto:daniel.kastl at georepublic.de>
>> Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list