[postgis-devel] [raster] Paths local to server
strk at keybit.net
Fri Mar 1 01:22:14 PST 2013
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:12:12PM -0800, Bborie Park wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:
> > On 28 February 2013 21:01, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:
> True, "flawed" might be a bit harsh. Incomplete would be a better
> word choice. We need to do away with the entire in-db and out-db
> notion and just return the pixel values.
Guys, I don't care about the terms you use, don't waste time with
that. Feel free to hit me as hard as you can :)
That said, the RFC2 was born to really describe the internal binary format.
If you read it under that light it should be consistent.
I suggest writing another RFC for the real transport format.
For example, the "Offline/Online" flag wouldn't be needed there.
Also check if there's space for a version (both in RFC2 and the subsequent)
as it will be important to have one.
http://www.cartodb.com - Map, analyze and build applications with your data
More information about the postgis-devel