[postgis-devel] [raster] Paths local to server

Sandro Santilli strk at keybit.net
Fri Mar 1 03:16:09 PST 2013

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 05:48:23AM -0500, Pierre Racine wrote:
> > That said, the RFC2 was born to really describe the internal binary format.
> > If you read it under that light it should be consistent.
> Which internal binary format? The one specifying the path or the one containing "external" data?

The one specifying the path. The format of the value stored inside PostgreSQL.

> > I suggest writing another RFC for the real transport format.
> And RFC3 would make RFC2 obsolete or both would coexist?

Both would coexist.


More information about the postgis-devel mailing list