[postgis-devel] 2.1 beta status Vote: +1

[Stephen Woodbridge]

On 5/1/2013 6:03 PM, Paragon Corporation wrote:
>   Devrim,
>
> I'd love to.  Does it require it to be feature complete though or does it
> not have to be feature complete for beta?
>    I think we are more or less feature complete at this point.
>
> But need to verify with
>
> Strk,prasmey,dustymugs, pracine, colivier they don't have too much left
> outstanding and PSC has to vote of course too.
>
> But I'm giving my official +1 .
>
>
> I've got some loose ends to tie up with tiger geocoder, but that is more of
> a side extra anyway and not part of core PostGIS.
>
>
> And Devrim -- since you now package pgRouting as well -- may want to talk
> with pgRouting folks. Would be nice to have that tested alongside 9.3.  I
> haven't had a chance to test pgRouting  1.07 on 9.3 yet, but planning to and
> also to package for 9.3 beta.  I suspect pgRouting 2.0 won't be ready before
> 9.3 comes out.
>
> Steve -- thoughts?  I've also cc'd pgRouting development so Daniel et.al can
> chime in.

I not sure we have defined in detail what 2.0 release is going to be. We 
have discussed it a bunch, but Daniel has been busy and I'm the only one 
working on the release. I suppose we could arbitrarily declare it done 
once I have refactored the API, as we have merged a lot of new code 
already. But a big missing piece is the documentation. I'll try to 
figure this out with Daniel.

Meanwhile, the safe thing to do is plan on packaging a release out of 
master on github. I have not paid much attention to that. That said my 
branch sew-devel-2_0 currently builds and works on pg9.2 and postgis 1.5 
and 2.0.

Is postgis 2.1 in trunk? or the mirrored github repository? If so, I 
would be happy to pull that when I have some time and verify that my 
branch works with that.

Thanks,
   -Steve

> Thanks,
> Regina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Devrim GÜNDÜZ
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 2:40 PM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: [postgis-devel] 2.1 beta status
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Per
> http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/archives/303-Which-PostGIS-should-you-
> use-with-PostgreSQL-9.3.html
>
> and given that PostgreSQL 9.3 will go beta sometime next week, I think we
> need 2.1 beta for testers. Are you planning to release beta1 before
> PostgreSQL 9.3 beta?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Devrim GÜNDÜZ
> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> PostgreSQL Danismani/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
> Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
> http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
>
>