[postgis-devel] PSC/Development Vote -- Baris to release upcoming 2.1.3 jars and manually sign

Paragon Corporation lr at pcorp.us
Mon Apr 28 11:55:38 PDT 2014


Baris,
 
Possibly stupid questions
1) What is the jdbc_jtsparser for vs. the current jdbc
2) Can we have parent pom at root of Java that runs the child poms
 
right now in Jenkins I have two separate jobs going -- 1 to build the jdbc
and one to build the jdbc_jtsparser. Both get dumped here:
http://postgis.net/stuff/
 
 
 For some reason (possibly ineptness on my part), I can't get this into one
maven job.
It's my understanding that if we have a parent pom (possibly in java
folder), I can just call that to build both.
 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13988469/maven-multi-module-pom-and-jenki
ns-jobs
 
Is that possible or am I totally misunderstanding this.
 
Thanks,
Regina

  _____  

From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Baris Ergun
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 2:08 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] PSC/Development Vote -- Baris to release
upcoming 2.1.3 jars and manually sign


Hi; 

Only that jdbc_jtsparser project can also be added to Jenkins projects for
both branches/2.1 and trunk. No other specific script necessary.
(java/jdbc_jtsparser) running  'mvn clean install' on code changes would be
enough.

Thanks.
Baris.


On 26 April 2014 07:06, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:



Baris,
 
Yes we do have  a continuous integration bot. Do you have a script I can
schedule her to run or is what is running so far okay.
 
Currently have this job which runs for jdbc. 
http://debbie.postgis.net:8080/view/PostGIS/job/PostGIS_2.1_JDBC/
 
 As far as I can tell last run was successful
 
http://debbie.postgis.net:8080/view/PostGIS/job/PostGIS_2.1_JDBC/558/console
 
If you do have a script, just commit it to this folder:
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/browser/buildbots/debian/scripts
 
(I don't have all her scripts in subversion yet but is on my todo)
 
 
Thanks,
Regina
 

  _____  

From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Baris Ergun
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 4:53 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion 

Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] PSC/Development Vote -- Baris to release
upcoming 2.1.3 jars and manually sign


Completed the task and tested the building of artifacts on branches/2.1
basically now we have separate jdbc and jdbc_jtsparser projects (which must
be built consecutively). Do we have an continuous integration server where I
can integrate? Otherwise I will have to ask for your help on verification.


On 24 April 2014 13:41, Baris Ergun <barisergun75 at gmail.com> wrote:


Okey than will start soon.


On 22 April 2014 22:38, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:


make it so +1


On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for release of 2.1.3 jar.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>>
>> Baris,
>>
>> Regarding this:
>>
>> > Here is my proposal: I can take care of the last  targeted 2.1 release
>> > which is 2.1.3 and change pom.xmls as I did in the trunk and apply
shanes
>> > patches and after the release of 2.1.3 I can manually sign the jars and
>> > submit them to OSSRH. And keep discussing the separation of
>> > repositories on trunk.
>>
>> +1 for that.  Others in PSC and development please vote on this as well
so
>> we can start moving on this.
>>
>> I think we'll be releasing a 2.1.3 fairly soon.  2.2.0 we are looking at
>> at least another 4 months and that's being hopeful :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>> http://www.postgis.us
>> http://postgis.net
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Baris Ergun
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 4:50 AM
>> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
>> Cc: PostGIS Development Discussion
>> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] [postgis-devel] looking for a public well
>> known maven repository for postgis-jdbc 2.1 and later on versions
>>
>> Hi Shane;
>>
>> People are busy with other stuff so until we decide to separate the
>> repositories for postgis java projects I have applied ur patches to both
>> jdbc and jdbc_jtsparser projects. So what this means is "when we release
>> 2.2.0 postgis I would be ready to submit these two jars manually to
OSSRH".
>>
>> Baris
>>
>>
>> On 7 April 2014 21:26, Shane StClair <shane at axiomalaska.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Baris,
>>>
>>> Oops, I didn't see that you were already chasing this down. Your
approach
>>> sounds great, thanks for taking the lead on this! In the past there have
>>> been issues with other projects having non-resolvable dependencies on
>>> versions of postgis-jdbc (Hibernate Spatial), so it will be great to
have
>>> these artifacts in the central repo.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Shane
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Baris Ergun <barisergun75 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Shane;
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for ur patch and consideration. I think we are on the same path
>>>> if u check the issue #2626. I have applied the OSSRH and got the
credentials
>>>> for being able to upload postgis jdbc jars to central maven rep. For
that
>>>> case I have separated the jdbc and jdbc-jtsparser jars on the trunk and
>>>> updated the pom.xml's according to Central maven repository
requirements..
>>>> On the trunk actually I was waiting to agree  with all the developers
to
>>>> separate the postgis jdbc jars  repository and continue with 1st
suggested
>>>> approach.  If we do that way we wouldnt need to make the explicit
plugin
>>>> declarations as you patched in 2702.
>>>>
>>>> Here is my proposal: I can take care of the last  targeted 2.1 release
>>>> which is 2.1.3 and change pom.xmls as I did in the trunk and apply
shanes
>>>> patches and after the release of 2.1.3 I can manually sign the jars and
>>>> submit them to OSSRH. And keep discussing the separation of
repositories on
>>>> trunk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6 April 2014 05:32, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have any objections.  +1 for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Regina
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Shane
StClair
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 5:24 PM
>>>>> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
>>>>> Cc: PostGIS Development Discussion
>>>>> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] looking for a public well known maven
>>>>> repository for postgis-jdbc 2.1 and later on versions
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds good. Any objection to the community manually uploading pre-2.2
>>>>> versions to Maven Central?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Shane
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shane,
>>>>>> I think we can change our build bot to upload to maven as part of the
>>>>>> official release job when we build tagged docs etc.  Have to talk
over with
>>>>>> rest of PostGIS psc and dev folks on that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess before that we'll need to completely cleanup the issues with
>>>>>> our current jdbc which sounds like we are close.  Thanks for the
patch BTW.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Regina Obe
>>>>>> PostGIS PSC member
>>>>>> http://www.postgis.us
>>>>>> http://postgis.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>> From: postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Shane
StClair
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 3:29 PM
>>>>>> To: postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> Subject: [postgis-users] looking for a public well known maven
>>>>>> repository for postgis-jdbc 2.1 and later on versions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just submitted a patch [1] to generate javadoc and source jars as
>>>>>> part of the postgis-jdbc build. Otherwise, the existing pom meets the
Maven
>>>>>> Central sync requirements [2].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are two options for getting up to date postgis-jdbc releases
>>>>>> into Maven Central. The first would be for Maven Central deployment
to
>>>>>> become part of the postgis release process. After the initial setup
the
>>>>>> Maven Central publishing process isn't terribly painful, but it would
>>>>>> require a postgis developer to assume responsibility for the Maven
Central
>>>>>> submission and for postgis-jdbc to get special consideration during
releases
>>>>>> [3] [4].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The other option would be to have the community manually upload to
>>>>>> Maven Central [5]. This is definitely not the ideal situation, but if
Maven
>>>>>> Central uploads are out of scope for the postgis devs right now it
would
>>>>>> allow us to get updated versions into the central repo. A blessing
from the
>>>>>> postgis devs would help in this second case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Shane
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2702
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Central+Sync+Requirements
>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>
https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html
>>>>>> [4] http://central.sonatype.org/pages/ossrh-guide.html
>>>>>> [5]
>>>>>>
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Uploading+3rd-party+Artifacts+t
o+The+Central+Repository
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Shane StClair
>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>> Axiom Consulting & Design
>>>>>> http://www.axiomalaska.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Shane StClair
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> Axiom Consulting & Design
>>>>> http://www.axiomalaska.com
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>>>> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Barış
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shane StClair
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Axiom Consulting & Design
>>> http://www.axiomalaska.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Barış
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel




-- 

Barış




-- 

Barış

_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel





-- 

Barış
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20140428/77d75bd6/attachment.html>


More information about the postgis-devel mailing list