[postgis-devel] upgrading to 2.2.0dev from 2.1

[Rémi Cura]

Hey,
thanks everybody for advices :

Finally, the bug is :
if you don't have "xlstproc", no extension file is created.

If it is so required, it should stop at the configure step if missing.

Cheers,
Rémi-C


2014-03-10 10:37 GMT+01:00 Rémi Cura <remi.cura at gmail.com>:

> Hey,
> thanks for your help !
>
> I don't have a folder extensions/postgis/sql
>
> I have a folder extensions/postgis/sql_bits , with the files "
> mark_editable_objects.sql.in"  "remove_from_extension.sql.in".
>
> I attached the log file from the command make and a log file for the
> command sudo make install
>
>
> I'm a little bit worried that when doing a "sudo ldconfig",
> I get 2 errors :
> /sbin/ldconfig.real: /usr/local/lib/libgdal.so.1 is not a symbolic link
> /sbin/ldconfig.real: /usr/local/lib/liblwgeom-2.2.0dev.so is not a
> symbolic link
>
>
>
>
> Following you advice I retryed make clean make make install after renaming
> postgis-2.1.so , same problem.
>
> Cheers,
> Rémi-C
>
>
> 2014-03-07 23:22 GMT+01:00 Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us>:
>
>>  Remi,
>>
>> Forgot to say also there is a bug in upgrading from PostGIS 2.1 - 2.2
>>
>> to upgrade you'll need to rename  your postgis-2.1.so file before you
>> can upgrade a 2.1 db to 2.2
>>
>> see this ticket: http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2382
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> Regina
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
>> postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Rémi Cura
>> *Sent:* Friday, March 07, 2014 2:09 PM
>> *To:* PostGIS Development Discussion
>> *Subject:* Re: [postgis-devel] upgrading to 2.2.0dev from 2.1
>>
>>
>> About gdal : a 'sudo ldconfig', and now postgis_full_version is no more
>> mistaken.
>>
>> I still have  issue about postgres update script.
>> Shall I manually create the update script from 2.1 to 2.2 by fusing the
>> rt_postgis--2.1--2.2 , postgis .. ??
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cheers,
>> Rémi-C
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-07 20:01 GMT+01:00 Rémi Cura <remi.cura at gmail.com>:
>>
>>>   Hey List,
>>> I downloaded and compiled the latest postgis version (from git).
>>>
>>> Everything runs smootlhy (new dependency for bison ?).
>>>
>>> Butmake install is not doing what it should.
>>>
>>> it creates the 'postgresql/9.3/contrib/postgis-2.2 folder' and file it
>>> with the stuff,
>>> but it doesn't create the files in 'postgresql/9.3/extension'
>>> such as postgis--2.2.0dev.sql, postgis--2.1-2.2.sql, and so.
>>>
>>> I created a postgis--2.2.0dev.sql by fusionning postgis.sql,
>>> rt_postgis.sql, spatial_ref_sys.sql,and changed the 'postgis.control'
>>> manually
>>> ,
>>> so I was able to add to a fresh database 'CREATE EXTENSION postgis
>>> VERSION '2.2.0dev'.
>>>
>>> Yet the version of GDAL is still the old one (according to postgis full
>>> version)
>>> In ./configure the correct version of gdal was recognized (1.11)
>>>
>>> Am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Rémi-C
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20140314/b32f4558/attachment.html>