[postgis-devel] address standardizer: core or extra?

[Greg Troxel]

"Paragon Corporation" <lr at pcorp.us> writes:

> As Steve said we plan to make this a core piece of our upcoming
> development and it is already used an optional feature for tiger
> geocoder, so we would prefer you consider it as a key part of PostGIS,
> especially since it's dependencies aren't too heavy.

That's ok with me.  The dependencies are fairly small (beyond what's
needed anyway).

Arguably the README for postgis should say this, as a clue to packagers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20151215/14cd2557/attachment.sig>