[postgis-devel] ST_AsMVT

[Björn Harrtell]

2016-09-18 7:48 GMT+02:00 Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io>:

> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 05:47:39PM -0700, Paul Norman wrote:
> > On 9/17/2016 8:09 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> > >Using a row-by-row approach, makes it impossible to build such
> > >dictionary, which is why my early attemps were just at producing
> > >the geometric part, very much like the GML output works, delegating
> > >composition of the whole final product to the caller (which could
> > >eventually also be a ROW-taking wrapper).
> >
> > You're right. Joining different layers is fine, but each layer has
> > some common information that is needed.
> >
> > Should it be an aggregate function then?
>
> Probably, which means you'd also need to define a type
> to represent the state (including the dictionary, for example).
> It's enough stuff that might be better to move into its own
> extension.
>

What do you think about the alternative of simply supplying the function
with a name of a table or view assuming the the proposed structure then
dynamically query it internally using the supplied bounds?


>
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20160918/01dee679/attachment.html>