[postgis-devel] extras/tiger_geocoder/upgrade_geocoder.bat and CRLF

[Sandro Santilli]

I'll add that reading the git log is fun:

  git log --stat extras/tiger_geocoder/upgrade_geocoder.bat 

A summary of what you find in there:

  - Regina: do something
  - Strk: fix line ending
  - Regina: do something
  - Strk: fix line ending

It's about time to stop that :)

https://git.osgeo.org/gogs/postgis/postgis/commits/svn-trunk/extras/tiger_geocoder/upgrade_geocoder.bat

Regina: please take action or I'm tempted to just change
.gitattributes *not* to request CRLF in those files...

--strk;

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:24:42PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> My git-svn setup insists in adding carriage returns to the
> extras/tiger_geocoder/upgrade_geocoder.bat file, as requested
> by the following .gitattribute entry:
> 
>   *.bat     eol=crlf
> 
> The carriage returns where stripped by Regina in a recent commit:
> 
> 		commit 0320c64fe2a1b480eef2c4cfa437536152545c22
> 		Author: Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us>
> 		Date:   Thu Jul 27 16:19:13 2017 +0000
> 
> 				Geocoder enhancements, add zip4 and address_alphanumeric, adjustments to pagc matching
> 				Closes #3747
> 				Closes #3748
> 
> 				git-svn-id: http://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/trunk@15508 b70326c6-7e19-0410-871a-916f4a2858ee
> 
> 		 extras/tiger_geocoder/upgrade_geocoder.bat | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 		 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> So the question now is: is the .gitattribute entry not reflected in the
> SVN world ? Does anyone know how to reflect it ? Note that I'm happy with
> never using carriage-returns, as long as we are consistent about it...
> 
> --strk;