[postgis-devel] PSC Vote: Change PostGIS library name to drop the minor
Greg Troxel
gdt at lexort.com
Wed Aug 30 05:00:15 PDT 2017
"Darafei \"Komяpa\" Praliaskouski" <me at komzpa.net> writes:
> I think we need someone to set up experiment, if it is possible to symlink
> just any library before update, or if it should really match. If it's not
> called in upgrade and stuff like autovacuum/autoanalyze/whatever uses
> postgis functions silently are shut down, it may happen that just presence
> of a shim is enough.
Reading more, I think I understand what's going on (and that you aren't
doing dump/restore).
It strikes me that the basic issue is that the pgupgrade process as
currently constructed is looking for a version of the library that used
to be installed. You are working around that by putting in a symlink so
that it will, when opening the old version, get the new version. That
only works if the versions are ABI compatible.
So I think we should be asking if the upgrade process is right, and if
it wants to run the old version (because it's doing something like
dump/restore on the fly?) then maybe it's necessary to have both
installed at once?
I certainly don't understand what's going on now to think that
essentially changing names to mask the disconnect between new/old is
sound.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 162 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20170830/afeab049/attachment.sig>
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list