pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
Tue Oct 3 12:28:54 PDT 2017
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:24:40AM +0200, Björn Harrtell wrote:
>> Is not returning void enough to indicate a function (that does something) mutates?
> I think taking a non-const LWGEOM pointer should be enough.
> I'm not enthusiast about adding thos 9 characters to each
> and every function.
Well, since we can’t to function over-loading, we’ll need to have *some* signature difference, have a shorter-yet-still-evocative suggestion?
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the postgis-devel