[postgis-devel] Why do we still install liblwgeom includes

[Regina Obe]

I like that idea.  That include causes me nothing but grief.  I had the same issue on Debbie last week.  I had to delete liblwgeom which include got installed in the PostgreSQL folder.

 

From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Darafei "Kom?pa" Praliaskouski
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 6:40 AM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Why do we still install liblwgeom includes

 

What if we stop installing the includes at all?

There's another case in Raster: https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4260 

 

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 6:52 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl <mailto:sebastic at xs4all.nl> > wrote:

On 9/16/18 5:32 PM, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
> Looking on my Ubuntu Bionic system, python-qgis 2.18.17 is the only
> non-postgis package that depends on liblwgeom-dev. I don't know why.

Most likely to have the dependencies installed for the Processing LWGEOM
Provider plugin. See:

 https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-February/041507.html

Kind Regards,

Bas

_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org> 
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel




 

-- 

Darafei Praliaskouski

Support me: http://patreon.com/komzpa

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20181127/70ddfa3d/attachment.html>