[postgis-devel] PostgIS 3.0 beta 1 ready?

[Paul Ramsey]

Not even a little… I really would like to have some kind of “solution” to the problem of extra flag space the 3D people need, even if I don’t end up touching the overall serialization beyond that.

> On May 21, 2019, at 9:18 AM, Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> 
> Are we ready for a PostGIS 3.0 beta 1release?
>  
> Any more features we plan to put in 3.0 before we nail the box?
>  
> I’d like to package a PostGIS 3.0 beta 1 to go with the PostgreSQL 12 beta 1 as I see PostgreSQL 12 now shipping with PostGIS 2.5.2 
> which is discouraging given the effort we’ve put in to take advantage of PostgreSQL 12 features with 3.0.
>  
> relevant thread on IRC:
>  
> [11:42] <Myon> trying postgis on PG12beta1: https://pgdgbuild.dus.dg-i.net/job/postgis-binaries-beta/architecture=amd64,distribution=sid/35/console <https://pgdgbuild.dus.dg-i.net/job/postgis-binaries-beta/architecture=amd64,distribution=sid/35/console>
> [11:42] <sigq> Title: postgis-binaries-beta » amd64,sid #35 Console [Jenkins] (at pgdgbuild.dus.dg-i.net <http://pgdgbuild.dus.dg-i.net/>)
> [11:42] <Myon> is that a PostGIS problem, or one in PostgreSQL? (timestamp 17:39:21)
> [11:43] <robe2> Myon you should be using PostGIS 3.0 for 12
> [11:43] <Myon> well that doesn't exist yet
> [11:43] <robe2> Myon if we shipped a beta would that help?
> [11:43] <robe2> We are planning to release PostGIS 3.0 around same time as 12
> [11:44] <robe2> because it has a lot of stuff just for 12 :)
> [11:44] <Myon> a beta would help sortish, because I wouldn't want to ship to users before it's stable, while still trying to support PG12
> [11:45] <Myon> it's just these extra "WARNING:  stats for "t.g" do not exist" lines, the rest of the tests works
> [11:45] <Myon> does it make sense that these are duplicated now, or is that something that should be fixed in PostgreSQL itself? (I haven't yet read any postgis code)
> [11:45] <robe2> Okay let me bring it up for discussion on postgis dev
> <robe2> we aren't testing PostgreSQL 12 on 2.5 -- so it may not work completely until release time as we won't be in a rush to fix issues on 12 in 2.5 until release
> [11:46] <robe2> and the most we'd promise is it compiles -- not necessarily it regresses
> [11:48] <Algunenano> About the duplicated messages, I think that the issue had to do with CTEs and robe2 fixed it in 3.0 and refushed (:D) to fixed it in 2.5
> [11:50] <robe2> :D) yap I refused we didn't put in all this effort in 3.0 for 12 just to have people shipping 2.5 with 12
>  
>  
> If we aren’t ready maybe we should just wait till PG 13 comes out and forgo the 3.0 release in September. As there is no point in shipping a 3.0 mid cycle after PostgreSQL 12 is released and if packagers are going to ship a 2.5.  Everyone will be settled in on a 2.5 and won’t waste their time upgrading to a 3.0 even if packagers were willing to ship a 3.0 with 12, which most WILL NOT.
>  
> Thanks,
> Regina
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20190521/59412c42/attachment-0001.html>