[postgis-devel] Stable Branch Naming : Git

[Regina Obe]

I read that as push your work you are unsure of to a personal fork and then do a pull request.
I don't think we need to do that for minor changes.

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 1:04 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Stable Branch Naming : Git

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:02 AM <rmrodriguez at carto.com> wrote:

> Regarding this, can we keep only stable branches + master in the fancy 
> new repo? I don't like having development branches in the main 
> repository.

As in "push your work to a personal fork and PR from there"? works for me (though inevitably I'm going to fat-finger a push to origin)

P
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel