Users mailing list configuration change

[Sandro Santilli]

It's been almost two months that postgis-devel runs with the new
configuration and I didn't read any complaint. Are you ok with
me doing the same on postgis-users ? Do you think we should ask
before change ?

--strk;

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:36:06AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> Given nobody complained about the proposal, I've changed the configuration
> of this mailing list following the reccomendations of the OSGeo SAC team,
> please let me know if you have any problem with this.
> 
> --strk;
> 
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 11:21:30AM +0100, 'Sandro Santilli' via postgis-devel wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 09:43:44AM +0200, 'Sandro Santilli' via postgis-devel wrote:
> > > 
> > > I like discussing before voting, let's have a test with postgis-tickets
> > > and maybe we'll extend the test to other list ?
> > > 
> > > Ideally someone using DKIM/DMARC to send mail will be able to evaluate
> > > effects of that change.
> > 
> > We made the test and it was successful.
> > The DKIM signatures of senders were not ruined by taking the steps
> > described here:
> > 
> >   https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/3011#comment:23
> > 
> > How do the subscribers of this list feel about taking those steps
> > for this list ? The consequence would be:
> > 
> >   1. No more [postgis-devel] suffix in the Subject
> >   2. No more footer in each message
> >   3. Always have From/Reply-To/Sender headers
> > 
> > If you use subject-based filters to organize your email you could
> > update them to use the List-Id header instead, which contains
> > (already) this string:
> > 
> >    PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel.lists.osgeo.org>
> > 
> > --strk;