Rename "master" branch to "dev" ?
Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
me at komzpa.net
Sun Nov 30 10:47:23 PST 2025
-0 let's move once they invent something next after git that we move to.
I'm ok with master/main; dev for me is part of the dev-test-prod triangle.
I do have svn-trunk in my fork indeed but that's just because it does not
matter and it's still there from the old times.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 11:47 PM Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
> In IRC/Matrix we got back to discuss branch naming, due to
> CI still having traces of "main" which has been an alias at some point [1]
>
> As the last attempt at getting rid of the "master" name was stuck [2]
> due to Regina wanting to see other projects make the strong-move
> before bothering [3] and given today nobody would really be using "master"
> anymore while some of us use different names (I use "main" locally, Darafei
> still uses "svn-trunk" for his admission, dunno others), I thought I'd
> re-start
> a thread about branch renaming with a new proposal, which is now even
> SHORTER !
>
> How would you like "dev" for the main development branch ? It'd be:
> - 1 letter shorter than "main"
> - 3 letters shorter than "master"
> - very cool ! 😎
> - clear
> - uncrowded, so nobody feels the need to run the other way
>
> [1]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/2021-January/028778.html
> [2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/2021-June/028983.html
> [3]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/2021-January/028781.html
>
> So, what do you think ? Can we turn more plusses than minuses ?
>
> --strk;
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 05:38:06PM -0500, Regina Obe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:18:20AM +0300, Darafei "Kom?pa"
> Praliaskouski
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hey, the point of the thing is not to add a thing called "main" but
> to
> > > > get rid ot the thing called "master" which your plan fails to
> > > > accomplish. If we go there, go all-in.
> > >
> > > I know what's the plan, but "go all-in" takes time.
> > > I'm just offering a way to keep things working in the meanwhile.
> > >
> > > --strk;
> >
> > I'm a -0 for any change at all.
> > But if we are forced into this change I do like the idea of having a
> soft - main launch over a no-turning back main.
> >
> > I'd like to see other projects make the strong-move before we bother.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regina
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > postgis-devel mailing list
> > postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
> --
>
> Libre GIS consultant/developer 🎺
> https://strk.kbt.io/services.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20251130/d7cb034e/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list