LLM policy

[Sandro Santilli]

On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 05:10:51PM +0400, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:

> I believe AIs are covered by existing diversity statement of code of conduct:
> https://postgis.net/community/conduct/#diversity-statement

I agree on not defining a policy about which tools you can use to
contribute to PostGIS.

We need to be always careful about what we merge, and if it's too
difficult to review a contribution, we should not feel pressured to
accept it.

Shall communication become too verbose we'll see how to approach that
problem, maybe we're not affected because there aren't many Coding Agents
capable of filing Trac tickets ;)

DISCLAIMER: I've started my AI/LLM research relatively recently, and
            the view I expressed in my blog from Dec 2025 still holds
            https://strk.kbt.io/articles/2025-12-01-ai.html

--strk;


  Libre GIS consultant/developer 🎺
  https://strk.kbt.io/services.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20260612/229ff6f8/attachment.sig>