LLM policy

[Regina Obe]

> > I really cannot see this as reasonable.  Everyone is all humans, and
> > extending it to LLMs seems novel and at best highly controversial.
> 
> Strong +1 here. I'm very shocked by statements that LLMs could qualify as
> "someone". Someone obviously involves a biological entity originating from
> human cells. If we start to acknowledge rights to bots, then humanity is in
> high danger. Especially since ethical AI doesn't exist (there might be lab
> experiments around that, but in practice that's not the one people use when
> they use commercial models). So you're currently dealing with things explicitly
> designed to make human users addict.
> There are numerous testimonies of events where "agents" start leaving the
> framework in which they were initially thought to be restricted and play
> according to their own "intents", and given the high dependence of our
> societies to computer networks, this is deeply concerning.
> 
> Even
> 
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.

We are 99% not human cells, we have way more bacteria in our body than human cells.
Our emotions everything boils down to what other things in our body are causing us pain or giving us pleasure.

Again I say we can come to the same conclusion by not debating what is everyone.

If a human kills you do you consider them more welcome than AI? 
You don't need AI to be unethical so the argument seems silly  -- just dump anthrax in peoples water.  Just throw an A-bomb on a continent. Put guards in to prevent the action not the thing or everyone doing it.

I still stand by "you judge the actions not the thing doing it, if you have concluded all things of that class are bad, then fine, block all those".
If something causes people to be addicts, it's bad period - that could be a drug dealer or AI.  I see no point in isolating AI out as if it were the only thing capable of evil in this world and simply because we deem it not human and therefore not worthy of respect.

My pace-maker could be co-opted, should I be deeply concerned, Yes, should I ban the pace-maker from my body? No.