LLM policy

[Even Rouault]

> I really cannot see this as reasonable.  Everyone is all humans, and
> extending it to LLMs seems novel and at best highly controversial.

Strong +1 here. I'm very shocked by statements that LLMs could qualify 
as "someone". Someone obviously involves a biological entity originating 
from human cells. If we start to acknowledge rights to bots, then 
humanity is in high danger. Especially since ethical AI doesn't exist 
(there might be lab experiments around that, but in practice that's not 
the one people use when they use commercial models). So you're currently 
dealing with things explicitly designed to make human users addict. 
There are numerous testimonies of events where "agents" start leaving 
the framework in which they were initially thought to be restricted and 
play according to their own "intents", and given the high dependence of 
our societies to computer networks, this is deeply concerning.

Even

-- 
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.