No subject

[Greg Troxel]

> LLM Policy - how do we answer to people why we don't need an LLM
> Policy

Can you clarify if in the minutes there was a preceding missing:

  the group decided that there is no need for an LLM policy

  the group agreed that existing rules imply [something] (specifically
  about if there is or isn't a duty to disclose, and about licensing of
  LLM output)

Given the list discussion, I am surprised by the one line in the
minutes.