comments about meeting agenda

[Sandro Santilli]

On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 08:42:32AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> 
> So one can build postigs, with the sfcgal dependency not installed, and
> get a postgis extension, and then later, with the sfcgal dependency
> installed/present, and build *just* the postgis-sfcgal extension, and
> when both packages are installed all works as the user expects?

I'm not sure about *just* the postgis-sfcgal extension, I suspect not,
but I guess we could accept a patch to allow that.

Buiding *without* the posgis-sfcgal extension should work.

> Those really aren't a big deal.   It's much more about depending on
> additional packages.

The following already works:

  ./configure --without-raster --without-sfcgal --without-topology

--strk; 

  Libre GIS consultant/developer 🎺
  https://strk.kbt.io/services.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20260617/c71ff6cf/attachment.sig>