comments about meeting agenda

[Regina Obe]

> Putting it in a separate repo forces it to work.
> 

That's not going to happen anytime soon because the internal postgis_sfcgal
and postgis_topology plumbing relies on the same core structures.

And yes I know strk you'd love to bring up about how if we laundered
liblwgeom around this issue would be solved.  I still think that brings up a
can of worms we are not prepared to deal with.


> >> Those really aren't a big deal.   It's much more about depending on
> >> additional packages.
> >
> > The following already works:
> >
> >   ./configure --without-raster --without-sfcgal --without-topology
> 
> Sure, but there's no --without-main-part --with-sfcgal to build the sfcgal
part
> so that when both builds have installed, it's all ok.
> That's what making things a separate extension means.

To strk's point yah we could conceivably do that but it's not a pressing
concern at the moment.  Patch welcome of course.


Thanks,
Regina