[postgis-tickets] [PostGIS] #3220: Mingw failure on cluster test
PostGIS
trac at osgeo.org
Sat Aug 22 16:01:59 PDT 2015
#3220: Mingw failure on cluster test
----------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: pramsey
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: PostGIS 2.2.0
Component: postgis | Version: trunk
Resolution: | Keywords:
----------------------+---------------------------
Comment (by robe):
dbaston,
Okay I put in a notice just before that line to show the mindist and
cxt->tolerance values and your suspicions seem correct, it's not getting
into the union loop.
For the test that is failing t3, this is what I see when I run against my
mingw64 9.4 postgresql
{{{
NOTICE: mindist: 0, cxt tolerance: 1.38242e+306
NOTICE: mindist: 0, cxt tolerance: 1.38242e+306
NOTICE: mindist: 4.24264, cxt tolerance: 1.38242e+306
NOTICE: mindist: 7.07107, cxt tolerance: 1.38242e+306
}}}
So it does look like the mindist is always higher than the tolerance, thus
wouldn't go into the UF_Union routine.
Now for comparison, If I run the same binaries against my 64-bit VC++ 9.4
build, here is what I get
{{{
NOTICE: mindist: 0, cxt tolerance: 1.4
NOTICE: mindist: 0, cxt tolerance: 1.4
NOTICE: mindist: 0, cxt tolerance: 1.4
NOTICE: mindist: 1.41421, cxt tolerance: 1.4
NOTICE: mindist: 1.41421, cxt tolerance: 1.4
}}}
As you see here the mindist is always lower than tolerance, so it works.
So not sure what's happening in the cxt->tolerance part, but that does
seem to be the problem.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/3220#comment:10>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.
More information about the postgis-tickets
mailing list