[PostGIS] #5690: Properly handle address numbers with dashes in them
PostGIS
trac at osgeo.org
Thu Mar 7 17:23:50 PST 2024
#5690: Properly handle address numbers with dashes in them
----------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: robe
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone: PostGIS Fund Me
Component: tiger geocoder | Version: master
Keywords: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------
As noted on manning book site
https://livebook.manning.com/book/postgis-in-action-third-
edition/chapter-10/
{{{
Here in Hawaii we have a lot of neighborhoods with hyphenated address
numbers, but these seem to cause issues with the TIGER geocoder. Any
hyphenated addresses return a street number of 0 and a rating of 20 when
geocoded. My naive guess is that this happens because the norm_addy type
has integer address numbers and the hyphenated info is lost during
conversion from string to norm_addy. Is this behavior possible to fix or
mitigate? Or is the PostGIS geocoder function incapable of properly
handling hyphenated addresses?
An example address to test is ‘94-709 Kaaholo St, Waipahu, HI 96797’
}}}
Tiger geocoder does a poor job of geocoding addresses where adress number
has dashes.
I know I've done some work to improve this such as introducing a
address_alphanumeric to preserve the original form of the address number,
but forget where I left off with this.
This isn't too high on my priority list though since most of the addresses
I deal with don't have dashes in the address number, so probably won't do
much for this in PostGIS 3.5
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/5690>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.
More information about the postgis-tickets
mailing list