[postgis] Re: [PATCHES] contrib/postgis spatial extensions

[Paul Ramsey]

This is something which has been discussed on our list in the past. The
main argument for BSD to date has been as you noted: to get eventual
mainline pgsql inclusion. The main argument against, in my view, is that
we want to be a place where open geomatics code can aggregate. At the
moment, most geospatial algorithms are only available under commercial
licencing regimes: until we get a critical mass of open projects and
workable code, inertia will continue to point us towards closed source
and development.

We'll talk about this a bit on the list and see what the PostGIS users
think.

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I'm for adding this to contrib, but is there any chance of getting it
> released under our BSD-style license, not GPL?  If it's GPL then it
> will never be a candidate to move out of contrib and into the main tree,
> which seems like something we'd like to do with it eventually.  The GPL
> license forbids us from merging GPL'd code into BSD-licensed code,
> so the best we can do with GPL'd code is keep it at arm's length in
> the contrib area.
> 
>                         regards, tom lane

-- 
      __
     /
     | Paul Ramsey
     | Refractions Research
     | Email: pramsey at refractions.net
     | Phone: (250) 885-0632
     \_

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Small business owners...
Tell us what you think!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/PhFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
postgis-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/