[postgis-users] Only allowing valid geometries to be created

Martin Davis mbdavis at VividSolutions.com
Fri Apr 11 07:52:22 PDT 2003


GEOS provides the geometryChanged() method to indicate to a Geometry that it should refresh its internal caches since it's coordinates might have changed.

Simply calling isValid will also update the cache.

Martin Davis, Senior Technical Architect
Vivid Solutions Inc.
Suite #1A-2328 Government Street   Victoria, B.C.   V8T 5G5
Phone: (250) 385 6040    Fax: (250) 385 6046
EMail: mbdavis at vividsolutions.com  Web: www.vividsolutions.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: strk [mailto:strk at freek.keybit.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 3:20 AM
> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Only allowing valid geometries to be
> created
> 
> 
> Solution #2 is the best IMHO.
> There has to be a way to run the check again at any time, though,
> after any modification, to ensure cached status is not wrong.
> This possibility may be given but not forced (if GEOS ensures to
> keep valid geoms valid there is no need to check again - my simplify
> function is likely to make them invalid and I would call the checker
> updating the status until I make it smarter)
> 
> setValidity(geom) -> changes status checking for validity
> isValid(geom) -> returns frag after checking
> 
> --strk;
> 
> dblasby wrote:
> > We are soon going to have functions like intersect(g1,g2), 
> xor(g1,g2), 
> > union (g1,g2) - these functions pretty much require valid 
> geometries.
> > 
> > The results of a function like union(g1,g2) where g1 or g2 
> are invalid 
> > could cause (1) errors (2) invalid results.
> > 
> > I've been thinking about:
> > 
> > 1. Only allow valid geometries to be created.  Basically 
> the creation 
> > would look like:
> >         a) Create Geometry  like now (does very small 
> amount of validity 
> > checking)
> >         b) run the isvalid() function on it.  If it fails, 
> throw an error
> > I.e.:
> > select 'LINESTRING(0 0, 0 0)'::geometry;
> > ERROR: invalid geometry
> > 
> > In this way (a) tables will only ever have valid geometries (b) 
> > functions will always have valid geometries as inputs (c) 
> Only have to 
> > run the isValid() function on a geometry once (at creation).
> > 
> > Unfortunately, the main disadvantage to this is sometimes 
> people want to 
> > have invalid geometries.  People might have multipolygns 
> that overlap, 
> > or GPS tracks that have repeated points, etc...  
> Unfortunately, they 
> > would never be able to get these geometries inside PostGIS 
> - leading to 
> > quite a bit of frustration during dataloading or querying.
> > 
> > Also, it would require geos to be installed.  As a work 
> around to this, 
> > we could just ignore the validity test -  postgis would 
> behave exactly 
> > as it does now.  This will not be a problem because all the 
> > sensitive-to-invalid-geometry-functions are in GEOS and, therefore, 
> > never callable.
> > 
> > 2. Add a flag to Geometry that is either VALID, INVALID, UNKNOWN.
> >        a) Create Geometry  like now (does very small amount 
> of validity 
> > checking)
> >        b) run the isvalid() function on it.  
> >                 INVALID - flag geometry
> >                 VALID     - flag geometry
> >                 geos not installed - flag geometry  UNKNOWN
> > 
> > Then the GEOS functions could throw an error if the flag is 
> INVALID. 
> >  Bad-dog geometries could still be put into the system, but 
> be unuseable 
> > with GEOS .
> > The big problem with this is that these flagged geometries would be 
> > binary-incompatible with the current geometries - a dump 
> and restore 
> > would be require before you could upgrade.
> > 
> > 3. Keep things as they are  - do a isvalid() whenever you do a GEOS 
> > function.  This would work fine, but will be slow due to 
> always running 
> > isvalid().
> > 
> > I'm leaning towards #2.
> > 
> > What think?
> > dave
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > postgis-users mailing list
> > postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> 



More information about the postgis-users mailing list