[postgis-users] Running createlang and postgis.sql
Mike Leahy
mgleahy at fes.uwaterloo.ca
Wed Jun 4 09:24:23 PDT 2003
Paul,
What we've got is PostgreSQL 7.2.1 and some early version of PostGIS (I
don't know how to determine what the actual version is). This is the
only binary version we could obtain (compiling our own in Cygwin was not
successful, as I've indicated in a post I made last week).
You should be able to find the un-paired 'end transaction' on line 761
of the postgis.sql file I attached in my last message. Perhaps the file
that came with the build we have is different than yours. I'm still
hoping that there would be someone out there that has an up-to-date
build for Win32.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: June 4, 2003 11:13 AM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Running createlang and postgis.sql
I just grepped through the SQL files, and there is not an apparently
obvious location of an extraneous commit. I also checked an upload of
the CVS source against a 7.3 PgSQL and got no error like Mike reported.
Could you give us your relevant versions, Mike?
Thanks,
P
chodgson at refractions.net wrote:
> I don't know off-hand where the begin _should_ go, but an extraneous
end/commit
> will certainly not hurt anything.
>
> I think the only reason for the transaction to be there is to cause
either ALL
> or NONE of the postgis functionality to be loaded - otherwise it is
rather
> painful to unload the half that got installed, and/or reload the rest,
after
> you've fixed whatever problem caused it to fail in the first place.
>
> I don't have time to look at the code right now, but I think there
should be a
> begin at the VERY beginning, and an end at the VERY end - with all the
separate
> files for different versions and components, it is not too hard to
understand
> why there are unmatched begins/ends.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Quoting Mike Leahy <mgleahy at fes.uwaterloo.ca>:
>
>
>>Robert,
>>
>>You are correct about the commit. I've found in the postgis.sql file
>>that I'm using there is an extraneous "end transaction;" about two
>>thirds of the way through the script (Line 761 of the attached file).
I
>>think that despite the lack of a matching "begin transaction;",
>>everything is working fine, but I don't want to find out later on that
>>I'm missing a bunch of the functions that are defined in this file.
Can
>>someone suggest whether I should add a begin transaction, and if so,
>>where should it go?
>>
>>Thanks for the help,
>>Mike
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
>>[mailto:postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of
Paul
>>Ramsey
>>Sent: June 3, 2003 11:47 AM
>>To: PostGIS Users Discussion
>>Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Running createlang and postgis.sql
>>
>>At a minimum we appear to have an extraneous 'commit' (or a missing
>>'begin') in the sql file which needs to be paired up. The other
warnings
>>
>>are normal and can be ignored -- when postgresql creates new types
there
>>
>>is a brief period of chicken-and-egg, when types have been created and
>>their constructurs have not, which raises a warning.
>>P.
>>
>>Robert W. Burgholzer wrote:
>>
>>>Mike,
>>>I just had the same question today, thanks for posting it. It seems
>>
>>that all
>>
>>>is right with the data import and I have successfully added data, and
>>>retrieved it via avpgcon. So, I would say, no, you needn't be
>>
>>concerned,
>>
>>>however, I am not the expert, thus all I say is speculation.
>>>
>>>Perhaps this is a newer, more extensive error condition being
reported
>>
>>by
>>
>>>postgresql, are you running postgresql 7.3.3?? (I am)
>>>
>>>Robert Burgholzer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>===== Original Message From PostGIS Users Discussion
>>>
>>><postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net> =====
>>>
>>>
>>>>Just a couple questions.when I run the command "createlang plpgsql
>>>>[DBNAME]" - I'm guessing that means the build that I got already
>>>>includes this language?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Next, when I run "psql -d independencia -f postgis.sql", I get the
>>>>following notices:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
>>>>'spatial_ref_sys_pkey' for table 'spatial_ref_sys'
>>>>
>>>>NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
'gc_pk'
>>>>for table 'geometry_columns'
>>>>
>>>>NOTICE: ProcedureCreate: type box3d is not yet defined
>>>>
>>>>NOTICE: ProcedureCreate: type spheroid is not yet defined
>>>>
>>>>NOTICE: ProcedureCreate: type wkb is not yet defined
>>>>
>>>>NOTICE: ProcedureCreate: type chip is not yet defined
>>>>
>>>>NOTICE: ProcedureCreate: type geometry is not yet defined
>>>>
>>>>NOTICE: COMMIT: no transaction in progress
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Is this an issue I should be concerned about?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>>Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>postgis-users mailing list
>>>postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
>>>http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>postgis-users mailing list
>>postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
>>http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list