[postgis-users] Re: Massive Lidar Dataset Datatype Suggestions?
Yves Moisan
ymoisan at groupesm.com
Mon Nov 15 05:42:33 PST 2004
Hi,
I am also still pondering how the heck I will be storing potentially large amounts of water quality [point] data. Integrating on space as Paul suggests is interesting, but other integration schemes could be useful, one being integration of the data "by object" (e.g. sensor, station ...).
In the example I am thinking of, a bunch of point data could be boxed both by time and sensor in the form of a single netCDF file (integration on object=sensor) for an arbitrary time bin (e.g. a day, a week ...).
I am still very hesitant as to what path is best. Wouldn't a netCDF file allow me to put all the relevant metadata as well that I could make sure meets some standard (e.g. FDGC-CSDGM) instead of potentially having to put that metadata in postgreSQL or an XML database ? Would the spatial querying machinery be efficient if the data were stored in netCDF files, e.g. could I still use just the coordinates of my data points in postGIS with a 3rd field being some sort of pointer to a BLOB in the form of a netCDF file ? I think if it is just for spatial queries, such a set up would be fine. But what if I wanted to further parametrize my queries by some attribute data (e.g. give me all point measurements < valueOrParameter=A > valueOrParameter=B) ? I guess depending on volume netCDF files could be opened from within postgreSQL without it being too heavy an operation ?
Your problem is one of sheer data volume and calls for some integration mechanism, but I think one doesn't have to have a data volume problem to realize that data integration is, in my opinion, a much more general problem for all of us.
Let us know what solution you chose. I am too very much interested.
Yves Moisan
Gerry Creager N5JXS wrote:
Hmmm... Can we start thinking in terms of a NetCDF data structure?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20041115/86253f22/attachment.html>
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list