[postgis-users] Is my query planner failing me, or vice versa?
Jessica M Salmon
jmsalmon at fs.fed.us
Tue Dec 13 14:58:12 PST 2005
strk,
postgis_full_version
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTGIS="1.0.2" GEOS="2.1.3" PROJ="Rel. 4.4.9, 29 Oct 2004" USE_STATS
DBPROC="0.3.0" RELPROC="0.3.0"
GeomUnion is a major component of the trigger function, but it only is used
when the query has a result (fires grow together). Such is not the case for
any of the explain analyze output shown in the chart. I do have some
massively complex geometries, indeed, but the geometry complexity itself
does not appear to account for the occasionally much-slower-than-expected
queries. Would the filter on the Distance function have the same
unpredictability (in terms of speed) as GeomUnion?
-Meghan
strk at refractions.
net
Sent by: To
postgis-users-bou PostGIS Users Discussion
nces at postgis.refr <postgis-users at postgis.refractions.
actions.net net>
cc
12/13/2005 03:44 Subject
PM Re: [postgis-users] Is my query
planner failing me, or vice versa?
Please respond to
PostGIS Users
Discussion
<postgis-users at po
stgis.refractions
.net>
Jessica,
the query plan sounds good to me, if it is performance
differences that hit your attention I guess they are due
to GeomUnion operating on differently complex geometries.
If you can handle to isolate the input geometries of
the slow operation that would help further analisys.
Also, telling us GEOS version (postgis_full_version())
would be helpful.
--strk;
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list