Res: Re: [postgis-users] CVS kind on Postgis

[Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha]

I don't want to believe that Postgresql couldn't manager several users on
the same table neither postgis. I believe this solutions is note quite nice
for concurrent updates.

This solutions don't check if any feature could be posted on a restricted
area don't you believe ?.

I hope could have another alternative.


sincerely
Ezequias

 
-------Mensagem original-------
 
De: Nicolas Ribot
Data: 07/29/05 11:49:20
Para: PostGIS Users Discussion
Assunto: Re: [postgis-users] CVS kind on Postgis
 
> Hi list,
>
> I would like to know if is possible to disable some users to post any
> geometry and attribute changing on a data base map restricted by some
> geometry area.
>
> Suppouse 2 teams need to update some base. One take the north area and
other
> south area. How postgresql could manager that kind of rule.
>
 
On a project where several people had to edit the same dataset, we
choose to cut it into several parts, put these parts into several
tables and configure each client to access his/her table.
At the end of the work, a merge of the different parts was done, with
only one operator checking parts limits to make them match.
 
Maybe it could be possible to create triggers checking who is updating
the table ?
 
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20050729/ace01769/attachment.html>